GitHub Hot Board

GitHub Hot Board · Archive du dépôt

mlichvar/rsntp

High-performance NTP server written in Rust (Cette description provient du dépôt lui-même.)

Données au October 22mlichvar

Meilleur rang

#130

Pépites sous-estimées

100

Étoiles totales

17

Forks totaux

1

Jours classés (30 j)

État du projetLicence: inconnuDernier push: inconnuIssues ouvertes (PR incl.): inconnu

Collecté depuis 2026-10-25 ; inconnu = pas encore récolté

Mettez le badge dans votre README · mlichvar/rsntp[![Mettez le badge dans votre README](https://git.vaiox.xyz/api/badge/mlichvar/rsntp.svg)](https://git.vaiox.xyz/fr/repo/mlichvar/rsntp)
<a href="https://git.vaiox.xyz/fr/repo/mlichvar/rsntp"><img src="https://git.vaiox.xyz/api/badge/mlichvar/rsntp.svg" alt="Mettez le badge dans votre README" height="20"></a>

Documentation du projet

rsntp

rsntp is an experimental high-performance NTP server written in Rust. It does not implement a full NTP client and relies on another NTP client and server to be running on the system instead. It periodically updates its state to mirror the real NTP client/server and uses multiple threads to serve the current system time.

By default, rsntp uses one thread for IPv4 and another for IPv6. In order to get the best performance, it’s necessary to increase the number of threads using the --ipv4-threads and --ipv6-threads options to correspond to the number of CPU cores available on the system.

The real NTP client/server needs to be configured to listen on 127.0.0.1 on port 11123 (or another port if specified with the --server-address option). For instance, the following configuration should work with chronyd:

allow 127.0.0.1
port 11123
bindaddress 127.0.0.1

The following graphs compare the rsntp performance with chronyd (version 4.1), as measured by ntpperf. The tests ran on a Linux machine with an Intel E3-1220 v6 CPU (4 cores) and a 1Gb/s Intel I350 network card. The maximum rate of NTP requests and responses at the 1Gb/s speed is about 1100k per second.

ntpperf

The graphs show that with rsntp the server starts dropping packets at a higher rate than chronyd and its performance is more stable as the rate of requests is increasing. chronyd does not use multiple threads as a server. It needs to be started in multiple instances sharing the server port in order to utilize multiple CPU cores. It starts dropping packets at a lower rate and the response rate is jumping up and down as the request rate is changing. With both implementations 4 threads/instances are needed on this system to fully saturate the 1Gb/s link without any packets dropped, but rsntp with 3 threads is very close to it.

Classements actuels

  • 130

    Pépites sous-estimées

    100 stars · 17 fork · Stars totales (croissant)

    Méconnus →

Évolution sur 30 jours

Étoiles cumulées

Évolution du rang

← Retour aux classements